Applying these numbers to the above physics formula, the result is: velocity 1 / (71 e-12 F/m) x (1. E-06 H/m) 105,868,288.9 meters per second as a representative velocity of electromagnetic energy through body tissue. How does this figure compare with that of the speed of light through a vacuum? Putting these two figures into a ratio gives: 299,792,458 meters per sec. 105,868,288.9 meters per sec. If that ratio is divided in half, the result.4158747, extremely close.4142136, the value for the square root.
Dna and proteins are key molecules of the cell nucleus
The formula reads (in the case of em velocity through a vacuum, and also a good approximation for air velocity 1/ (ε0μ0) where ε0 is the electrical permittivity, and μ0 is the magnetic permeability. The elder permittivity and permeability are commonly known physics constants: permittivity.85418782 e-12 farads/meter permeability. Lide,., handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 76th., (crc press, 1995. Applying these constants in the above formula indeed results in the velocity of light through a vacuum: 299,792,458 meters per second. Having this velocity figure makes it possible to compute electromagnetic frequencies (if the wavelength is also a known factor). However, the next question arises: do electromagnetic waves travel through biological tissue at this velocity? Perhaps a new velocity can be computed from the formula above, using values for permittivity and permeability through biological media. A representative figure for permittivity (ε) through body presentation tissue is: 71 e-12 farads/meter. 2, (Brooks/Cole publishing., 1996. And the permeability (μ) through body tissue is for all practical purposes, the same as that of a vacuum:. Patterson, radio-frequency and elf electromagnetic Energies, a handbook for Professionals, (Van Nostrand reinhold, 1995 chart on page.
Because there is no comparable term to octave in electromagnetic frequency terminology, the word octave will be used from this point onward to designate this /2 relationship (or x2 for an upper octave). It is a calculation that will be used often. Furthermore, dividing a frequency by life 2 (i.e., translating it into the immediate lower octave) can also be visualized as doubling its wavelength in an exact and exceedingly precise manner. Therefore, dividing the original Rubella resonant frequency.02866 e13 hz down by many octaves (i.e., doubling the wavelength many times) eventually brings us to a frequency at a representative octave low in the audio range: 164.23045. This could be a possible resonant frequency of the rubella genome in this low audio range. To debilitate this frequency, the following mathematical relationship was considered: multiplying this resonant frequency by the square root of 2 (1.4142136). A note is perhaps in order to the general reader: while these ideas are being presented in a manner to reach as wide an audience as possible, a brief explanation follows (involving the square root of 2 relationship) which will get slightly technical. One can proceed to the section following the starred line (if desired with no interruption in content. The general physics formula for the velocity of electromagnetic (EM) radiation through any medium equals the inverse of the square root of the product of the electrical permittivity and the magnetic permeability.
In this instance we will use the speed of light: 299,792,458 meters per second as a velocity. (Further comments regarding the use of this velocity follow shortly). Substituting the numbers into the forumla, we get 299,792,458 meters/second divided.32045 e-06 meters.02866 e13 hertz. This would be a possible theoretical resonant frequency for the rubella dna genome. It is interesting to note that this frequency falls at the high end of the infrared section of the electromagnetic spectrum (near visible light and in the general area of the spectrum that royal Rife had under consideration in his microscopic work. To access this frequency in the audio range, an accurate and resonant way to accomplish this it is to repeatedly divide the frequency. In music, this would be called going to a lower octave.
Ancestrydna, dna, tests for Ethnicity genealogy, dNA
The dimensions of the b-helix, which is by far the most common dna form for bacterial and eukaryotic life forms, tells us that:. One complete turn pdf of the helix spans a distance.4 angstroms on its axis. Ere are.4 base pairs in each helical turn. These measurements are given in Stryer,. Therefore, the spacing of the individual base pairs on the axis would.4 angstroms divided.4, which equals.403846 angstroms. In scientific notation, this can be written.403846 e-10 meters. The use of meters will now make it possible to convert this total length (or wavelength) to frequency.
Looking at an example from a real organism, the rubella measles virus contains 9755 base pairs in its entire dna genome. (For access to base pair information on viruses, go to ml ). 9755 base pairs x the base pair spacing.403846 e-10 meters.32045 e-06 meters total length. This is a figure that can be used as a possible wavelength for the rubella viral dna. To convert this wavelength to frequency, we turn to the physics formula: velocity / wavelength frequency, see. Johnson, Physics, 2nd., (John Wiley sons, 1992. 698, isbn, or any good physics text.
Information is widely available in medical and scientific journals, and extensive databases can also be accessed on the internet. The length of any object can be thought of as having a resonant frequency by virtue of correlation with a wave-length. For instance, a persons height has its own resonant wavelength and resultant frequency. Is it possible that an organisms entire dna genome could also possess a resonant wavelength and frequency related to its total length? Is there a way to calculate the entire length of an organisms dna genome?
Thanks to explicit analysis of dna structure, it is now accurately known how far apart the base pair molecules are spaced in that helix. If one knows exactly how many base pairs are contained in the complete genome, finding the entire length is a simple matter of multiplying the number of base pairs times the spacing. For an explanation regarding structure and base pairs of dna, see. Stryer, biochemistry, 4th., (W.H. As a point of discussion, it must be pointed out that advanced x-ray analysis of crystallized dna has shown that base pair spacing is not always consistent. There are some very localized areas that contain squeezing or spreading of the base pairs. However, for the purpose of this analysis, the classic Watson-Crick model of base pair spacing will be used, which is actually an average spacing over the entire length of the dna genome. To use any other model for this discussion would make it hopelessly complex for these purposes. For further discussion on this subject, see stryer,.
Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids : a structure for
This paper will explore some possibilities that might assist in shedding light on the resonance relationships. These mechanisms of action require that some type of physical parameter be available that can be converted into frequency. Two major physics relationships, that of converting a length into frequency (or wavelength, to be more accurate and that of converting mass into frequency, will be looked at in some detail. While it is acknowledged that some of the concepts presented in this paper will be open to dispute, it was felt that the sheer number of correlations found with from the audio frequencies currently being used begged a closer look. For that reason these ideas are being offered to the community of serious researchers as a springboard for further discussion. The concepts and frequencies discussed in this paper, and any materials eventually offered in conjunction with this paper, are in no manner intended to suggest treatment or cure for any disease or condition. Furthermore, this writer cannot assume any responsibility for enhancement of or degradation to physical health arising from use of the information presented in this paper. The developments in the past thirty to forty years in the field of genetics and molecular biology has resulted in an explosion of information available to anyone that cares to take a look.
The origin of the mors (Mortal Oscillatory rates of bacteria and viruses originally discovered by royal Rife during the first half of the twentieth century, has perplexed many people since that time. While it is generally acknowledged that some type of resonance phenomenon destroyed or debilitated the organisms, it has been difficult at best to pinpoint any association of specific frequency with what is physically affecting these life forms during the time digital of their debilitation or demise. What exactly might be the destructive mechanism that is affecting each organism? Is it a resonance related to its full size, or perhaps that of the nucleus, mitochondria, or capsid? Is it a correlation with some type of biochemical resonance? Why does each organism seem to need a specific frequency? Could the phenomenon be related to its dna, and if so, what is the resonance relationship? These questions and more have kept folks that use or explore rife-related technologies awake into the wee hours of the morning on many occasions, and have been the focus of endless animated discussions.
Bobcat students, faculty, and staff hold dear, said. Trauth, president of Texas State. The daily caller News foundation reached out to martinez for comment, but received none in time for press. Follow Rob Shimshock on Twitter, connect with Rob Shimshock on Facebook. Content created by The daily caller News foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact. Tags : department of education texas texas state university. A look at the Frequencies of Rife-related Plasma Emission devices by Charlene boehm, this is a story of an exploration with numbers.
Most importantly, the 20 amino acid "alphabet" of proteins potentially could be configured into more unique information-carrying structures than the four-letter alphabet of dna. 3:34 pm, rob Shimshock education Reporter, a college paper fired a writer who called the dna of white people an abomination, according to a monday report. Texas State University student journalist Rudy martinez said that white death will mean liberation for all in the november column and The University Star fired him after previously retracting and apologizing for the column, reported The college fix. The author of this column has jeopardized the atmosphere of inclusivity at this university and will no longer be published in The University Star, read a correction from the papers editorial board. Along with constructive criticism, the editorial board said that the paper has received death threats and hate mail, as well as threats to defund The University Star. Conservative students at Texas State have started a petition to defund the publication; it has over 1,500 signatures at the time of publication. Ontologically speaking, white death will mean liberation for all, said Martinez in his now-retracted column. Accept this death as the first step toward defining yourself as something other than the oppressor. Until then, remember writing this: I hate you because you shouldnt exist.
Dna, structure, copying, reading
Dna was discovered as a major chemical of the nucleus at about the same time mendel and Darwin published their work. However, during the early 1900s, proteins were considered better candidates as molecules able to transmit large amounts of hereditary information from generation to generation. Although dna was known biography to be a very large molecule, it seemed likely that its four chemical components were assembled in a monotonous pattern — like a synthetic polymer. Also, no specific cellular function had yet been found for dna. Proteins, on the other hand, were important as enzymes and structural components of living cells. Proteins were also known to be polymers of numerous amino acids. These polymers are called polypeptides.